![]() Horses had unlimited access to shelter, water, a trace mineralized salt block and hay in the feeder. In all, 25 horses fed off each feeder for 20 consecutive days. The groups of horses fed in rotation for four days, and every fourth day, groups were rotated to a different paddock which housed one feeder and a new round bale. Each feeder was placed on the ground in an outdoor dirt paddock. Groups were of similar age, initial weight, breed and gender. Twenty-five mature Quarter Horse and Thoroughbred geldings and mares from the UW- River Falls campus herd were used to form five groups of five horses. The Waste Less feeder also had collapsible side feeding panels, but panels were lowered by hand every day at 9:00 am and 9:00 pm to ensure horses had unlimited access to hay in the feeder. The Covered Cradle had collapsible side feeding panels that rested on the bale and compressed down as the bale was eaten. * Prices quoted at time of research (July 2010), delivery not included, and prices are subject to change. Waste Less ($1,450* JSI Innovations LLC, St. Tombstone Saver ($650* HiQual, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada) Ring ($300* R & C Livestock, Bethany, MO) Hay Sleigh ($425* Smith Iron Works Inc., St. Hayhut ($650* Hayhuts LLS, Deleon Spring, FL) Covered Cradle ($3,200* SM Iron Inc., Sanborn, MN) Cone ($1,195* Weldy Enterprises, Wakarusa, IN model R7C) Cinch Net ($147* Cinch Chix LLC, North Branch, MN) Nine round bale feeders, specifically manufactured and marketed to the horse industry, were tested, including (see above): Prior to storage, each round bale was individually weighed and analyzed. In June of 2010, 50 round bales were baled from a pure stand of orchard grass and were stored until fed. The objectives of this research were to determine hay waste, hay intake, horse weight change and economics of nine round-bale feeders and a no-feeder control during horse feeding. However, little research has been done to characterize hay waste resulting from different round bale feeders when used in horse feeding. Several types of round bale feeders for use during horse feeding exist and claim to reduce or eliminate hay waste. When fed to beef cattle, different round-bale feeder designs resulted in different amounts of wasted ha圓. Hay waste was found to be higher for horses fed costal bermudgrass and alfalfa round bales without a feeder (38% and 31%, respectively) compared to utilizing a ring feeder (2% and 9%, respectively)1. Dry matter storage losses of round bales can range from 2-40%, depending on type of forage, storage method, environment and storage length2. Waste from large round bales can occur during both storage and feeding. However, some horse owners report excessive hay waste and horse weight gain from horses feeding on round bales. The lower price coupled with the convenience of feeding are likely factors horse owners consider when feeding round bales. The cost of hay fed in a round bale package is typically lower on a per ton basis than small square bales. ![]() Round-bales are used throughout the horse industry as a means of providing forage to horses housed in poor pastures, dry lots, or during winter months1. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |